OBJECTIVE: To identify prognostic factors of postoperative functional outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective case series evaluating patients undergoing rotator cuff repair, analyzed by the UCLA score (pre and 12-month postoperative) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (preoperative). Patients' intrinsic variables related to the injury and intervention were evaluated. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to determine variables impact on postoperative functional assessment. RESULTS: 131 patients were included. The mean UCLA score increased from 13.17 ± 3.77 to 28.73 ± 6.09 (p<0,001). We obtained 65.7% of good and excellent results. Age (r= 0.232, p= 0.004) and reparability of posterosuperior injuries (r= 0.151, p= 0.043) correlated with the functional assessment at 12 months. After multivariate linear regression analysis, only age was associated (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The surgical treatment of rotator cuff tears lead to good and excellent results in 65.6% of patients. Age was an independent predictor factor with better clinical outcomes by UCLA score in older patients. Level of Evidence IV, Case Series.

OBJETIVO: Comparar dois métodos de avaliação da estabilidade dos componentes tibial e femoral nas artroplastias de joelho não cimentadas com plataforma rotatória. MÉTODOS: Para isso foram avaliados 20 pacientes (20 joelhos) através de uma análise de radiografias dinâmicas com intensificador de imagem e manobras de estresse em varo e valgo, que foram comparadas com radiografias estáticas em frente e perfil dos joelhos, analisadas por dois cirurgiões experientes, cegos um em relação ao outro. RESULTADOS: Os resultados das análises estáticas e dinâmicas foram comparados e demonstraram forte correlação estatística (p<0,001), utilizando-se o método Kappa de comparação. CONCLUSÃO: O componente tibial mostrou-se mais instável quando comparado com o componente femoral, tanto na análise estática, quanto na dinâmica. Nível de evidência IV, Série de Casos.

Objetives: Determine the stability of tibial and femoral components of 20 cementless knee arthroplasties with rotating platform. METHODS: The 20 patients (20 knees) underwent an analysis of dynamic radiographs with an image amplifier and maneuvers of varus and valgus which were compared to static frontal and lateral radiographs of the knees and analyzed by two experienced surgeons in a double-blind way. RESULTS: We could observe in this study that both methods showed very similar results for the stability of the tibial and femoral components (p<0,001) using the Kappa method for comparison. CONCLUSION: The tibial component was more unstable in relation to the femoral component in both static and dynamic studies. Level of evidence IV, Case Series.